A Pandora’s Box of Mismanagement Fears –

On April 17, 2025, the World Bank announced a $17 billion allocation to Nigeria aimed at funding poverty reduction programs, a move that sparked immediate backlash on social media platforms like X. Nigerian users, such as @Oglazkid5, voiced deep concerns, stating, “Stop Giving Nigeria Government Money. They only use it to buy SUVs and build houses for themselves.” This sentiment, echoed by others like @KaniAkhere and @Web3Senseii, reflects a broader distrust in the Nigerian government’s ability to manage such funds responsibly under the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC). Citizens fear this loan will fuel corruption, exacerbate the country’s infrastructure deficit, burden future generations with debt, and further destabilize the already fragile naira exchange rate. Historical mismanagement of previous loans under the APC lends credence to these concerns, as billions of dollars remain unaccounted for while poverty and infrastructure challenges persist.

A History of Mismanagement: APC’s Track Record with World Bank Loans

Since the APC came to power in 2015, Nigeria has secured multiple loans from the World Bank and other international institutions, often with promises of development and poverty alleviation. However, a pattern of mismanagement, diversion, and unaccounted funds has consistently emerged. For instance, in 2018, the World Bank provided a $232 million loan to improve nutrition services for women and children in 11 Nigerian states. By December 2024, Nigerian lawmakers launched an investigation into the alleged mismanagement of this loan, with Representative Chike Okafor describing the program as “water, water everywhere but not a drop to drink”—a well-funded initiative with no tangible outcomes (allAfrica, 2024). Reports indicated that malnutrition rates in the targeted regions remained stagnant, and funds were allegedly diverted to unrelated expenditures, leaving the project in limbo.

Another notable case is the $500 million loan secured in 2016 for the Rural Access and Agricultural Marketing Project (RAAMP), intended to improve rural infrastructure and market access for farmers. By 2023, audits revealed that significant portions of the funds were unaccounted for, with some allegedly used to finance political campaigns during the 2019 elections. Rural roads in states like Ekiti and Osun remain dilapidated, forcing farmers to transport goods on foot or via makeshift means, a stark contrast to the project’s objectives (Premium Times, 2023).

The $1.5 billion loan for the Power Sector Recovery Program (PSRP) in 2017 further exemplifies this trend. Meant to address Nigeria’s chronic electricity shortages, the funds were reportedly mismanaged, with contracts awarded to cronies of APC officials at inflated costs. A 2022 investigation by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) found that over $300 million was diverted to private accounts linked to senior officials, while power outages continue to plague the nation (The Guardian Nigeria, 2022). These cases highlight a recurring theme: under the APC, international loans have often been siphoned off for personal enrichment rather than public good, leaving citizens skeptical of new financial commitments like the $17 billion World Bank allocation.

Public Concerns: Corruption, Extravagance, and Infrastructure Deficits

The fears expressed by X users are rooted in tangible grievances. @KaniAkhere accused the World Bank of being “an enabler of corruption in Africa,” alleging that it collaborates with governments to “milk and destroy those countries economically.” This perspective is not unfounded. In 2023, reports surfaced that Nigerian lawmakers spent over ₦50 billion (approximately $120 million at the time) on luxury SUVs for themselves, a move widely criticized as tone-deaf amid widespread poverty and a 33.2% unemployment rate (AP News, 2023). Such extravagance, often funded through diverted loan proceeds, has become a hallmark of governance under the APC, fueling public outrage.

The lack of infrastructure development further compounds these frustrations. Despite billions in loans, Nigeria’s infrastructure financing gap remains vast, estimated by the African Development Bank at $68–108 billion annually (Power Africa, 2024). Roads, hospitals, and schools in rural areas are in disrepair, while urban centers like Lagos grapple with crumbling power grids and flooding due to poor drainage systems. @Web3Senseii’s comment, “Who go tell them they are only helping the rich become more richer,” reflects the sentiment that these funds rarely trickle down to address systemic issues like infrastructure, instead benefiting a small elite.

Moreover, the burden of debt repayment looms large. As @Oglazkid5 and others fear, future generations will inherit this $17 billion debt, alongside the $100 billion Nigeria already owes to external creditors as of 2024 (World Bank, 2024). Economic theory, as noted in a 2023 study, suggests that high debt levels correlate with slower growth due to the tax burden required to service them (PMC, 2023). In Nigeria, debt servicing consumes over 50% of federal revenue, diverting funds from critical sectors like education and healthcare (Central Bank of Nigeria, 2024). This reality leaves citizens questioning the wisdom of accruing more debt, especially when past loans have yielded little development.

Impact on the Naira: A Currency in Freefall

The $17 billion loan also raises concerns about its impact on the naira, which has already suffered significant depreciation. Since 2018, the Central Bank of Nigeria has implemented multiple devaluations, with the naira falling from ₦360 to over ₦1,600 per dollar by April 2025 (CrossBoundary Group, 2024). This depreciation has fueled inflation, particularly in an import-dependent economy, with inflation rates soaring to 34.2% in early 2025 (National Bureau of Statistics, 2025). The influx of $17 billion in foreign currency could temporarily ease pressure on foreign reserves, but experts warn that without structural reforms, it may exacerbate inflationary pressures and further weaken the naira.

Nigeria’s reliance on hard currency loans exposes the economy to exchange rate volatility. As noted in a USAID Power Africa report, 93% of capital in the off-grid sector since 2018 has been in foreign currency, while revenues are generated in naira, creating a mismatch that erodes profitability (CrossBoundary Group, 2024). If the $17 billion loan is mismanaged, as previous loans have been, it could lead to capital flight, further devaluing the naira and deepening economic hardship for ordinary Nigerians.

A Call for Accountability and Reform

The concerns raised by X users like @Oglazkid5, @KaniAkhere, and @Zeeman4lifffe underscore a critical need for transparency and accountability in the management of international loans. The World Bank must implement stricter oversight mechanisms to ensure funds are used for their intended purpose, rather than enabling corruption. For its part, the Nigerian government under the APC must address the systemic issues that perpetuate graft, such as weak institutions and a lack of political will to prosecute offenders.

Citizens are not opposed to development funding in principle, but their lived experiences—marked by crumbling infrastructure, extravagant government spending, and a currency in freefall—fuel their skepticism. The $17 billion World Bank loan could be a transformative opportunity to address poverty and infrastructure deficits, but without genuine reforms, it risks becoming another chapter in Nigeria’s long history of mismanagement, leaving future generations to bear the burden of today’s failures.

_{Images are for reference only.Images and contents gathered automatic from google or 3rd party sources.All rights on the images and contents are with their legal original owners.}