Original Coverage & Source Attribution: www.nature.com
Zuccarini, C., Ramachandran, K. & Jayaseelan, D. D. Material discovery and modeling acceleration via machine learning. APL Mater. 12, 090601 (2024).
Krishnan, N. A. Machine Learning for Materials Discovery: Numerical Recipes and Practical Applications (Springer Nature, 2024).
Kohn, W., Becke, A. D. & Parr, R. G. Density functional theory of electronic structure. J. Phys. Chem. 100, 12974–12980 (1996).
Wood, B. M. et al. UMA: a family of universal models for atoms. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 38, 129391–129427 (2026).
Krishnan, N. M. A. & Jablonka, K. M. Real AI advances require collaboration. Nat. Rev. Chem. 9, 573–574 (2025).
Kang, S. I., Shin, J. H., Wu, B. M. & Choi, H. S. Deep generative AI for multi-target therapeutic design: toward self-improving drug discovery framework. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 26, 11443 (2025).
Champiat, S. et al. From toxicity assessment to adaptive safety care: implementing comprehensive fast-track safety evaluation for anticancer drug development. ESMO Open 10, 105796 (2025).
Betala, S. et al. LeMat-GenBench: a unified evaluation framework for crystal generative models. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2512.04562 (2025).
Szymanski, N. J. et al. An autonomous laboratory for the accelerated synthesis of inorganic materials. Nature 624, 86–91 (2023).
Li, H. et al. Collective intelligence for AI-assisted chemical synthesis. Nature 651, 107–115 (2026).
Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Requirements and Guidelines (ISO, 2006).
Cucurachi, S., Van Der Giesen, C. & Guinée, J. Ex-ante LCA of emerging technologies. Procedia CIRP 69, 463–468 (2018).
Erakca, M., Baumann, M., Helbig, C. & Weil, M. Systematic review of scale-up methods for prospective life cycle assessment of emerging technologies. J. Clean. Prod. 451, 142161 (2024).
Xia, Q. et al. A strong, biodegradable and recyclable lignocellulosic bioplastic. Nat. Sustain. 4, 627–635 (2021).
Piccinno, F., Hischier, R., Seeger, S. & Som, C. From laboratory to industrial scale: a scale-up framework for chemical processes in life cycle assessment studies. J. Clean. Prod. 135, 1085–1097 (2016).
Zeni, C. et al. A generative model for inorganic materials design. Nature 639, 624–632 (2025).
Merchant, A. et al. Scaling deep learning for materials discovery. Nature 624, 80–85 (2023).
Lederbauer, M. et al. LeMat-Synth: a multi-modal toolbox to curate broad synthesis procedure databases from scientific literature. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2510.26824 (2025).
Tsoy, N., Steubing, B., Van Der Giesen, C. & Guinée, J. Upscaling methods used in ex ante life cycle assessment of emerging technologies: a review. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 25, 1680–1692 (2020).
Villares, M., Işıldar, A., Van Der Giesen, C. & Guinée, J. Does ex ante application enhance the usefulness of LCA? A case study on an emerging technology for metal recovery from e-waste. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 22, 1618–1633 (2017).
Marson, A., Benozzi, A. & Manzardo, A. Looking to the future: prospective life cycle assessment of emerging technologies. Chemistry 31, e202500304 (2025).
Kalinin, S. V. et al. Bringing ML to the real world: rewards are all we need. APL Mach. Learn. 4, 010901 (2026).
Guillén-Gosálbez, G. A novel MILP-based objective reduction method for multi-objective optimization: application to environmental problems. Comput. Chem. Eng. 35, 1469–1477 (2011).
Yue, D., Pandya, S. & You, F. Integrating hybrid life cycle assessment with multiobjective optimization: a modeling framework. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 1501–1509 (2016).
Groen, E. A. & Heijungs, R. Ignoring correlation in uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in life cycle assessment: what is the risk? Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 62, 98–109 (2017).
Tan, E. C. D. et al. Uncertainty in inventories for life cycle assessment: state-of-the-art, challenges, and new technologies. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 44, e14644 (2025).
Lloyd, S. M. & Ries, R. Characterizing, propagating, and analyzing uncertainty in life-cycle assessment: a survey of quantitative approaches. J. Ind. Ecol. 11, 161–179 (2007).
Groen, E. A., Heijungs, R., Bokkers, E. A. M. & De Boer, I. J. M. Methods for uncertainty propagation in life cycle assessment. Environ. Model. Softw. 62, 316–325 (2014).
Heijungs, R., Guinée, J. B., Mendoza Beltrán, A., Henriksson, P. J. G. & Groen, E. Everything is relative and nothing is certain: toward a theory and practice of comparative probabilistic LCA. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 24, 1573–1579 (2019).
Falinski, M. M. et al. A framework for sustainable nanomaterial selection and design based on performance, hazard, and economic considerations. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 708–714 (2018).
Schwarz, A. E. et al. Microplastic aquatic impacts included in life cycle assessment. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 209, 107787 (2024).
Schilling-Wilhelmi, M. et al. From text to insight: large language models for chemical data extraction. Chem. Soc. Rev. 54, 1125–1150 https://doi.org/10.1039/D4CS00913D (2025).
Krallinger, M., Rabal, O., Lourenço, A., Oyarzabal, J. & Valencia, A. Information retrieval and text mining technologies for chemistry. Chem. Rev. 117, 7673–7761 (2017).
Mavračić, J., Court, C. J., Isazawa, T., Elliott, S. R. & Cole, J. M. ChemDataExtractor 2.0: autopopulated ontologies for materials science. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 61, 4280–4289 (2021).
Jessop, D. M., Adams, S. E., Willighagen, E. L., Hawizy, L. & Murray-Rust, P. OSCAR4: a flexible architecture for chemical text-mining. J. Cheminform. 3, 41 (2011).
Weston, L. et al. Named entity recognition and normalization applied to large-scale information extraction from the materials science literature. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 59, 3692–3702 (2019).
Shetty, P. et al. A general-purpose material property data extraction pipeline from large polymer corpora using natural language processing. npj Comput. Mater. 9, 52 (2023).
Hira, K., Zaki, M., Sheth, D., Mausam & Krishnan, N. M. A. Reconstructing the materials tetrahedron: challenges in materials information extraction. Digit. Discov. 3, 1021–1037 (2024).
Song, Y., Miret, S. & Liu, B. MatSci-NLP: evaluating scientific language models on materials science language tasks using text-to-schema modeling. In Proc. 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) (eds Rogers, A. et al.) 3621–3639 https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.201 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2023).
Mullick, A. et al. Matscire: leveraging pointer networks to automate entity and relation extraction for material science knowledge-base construction. Comput. Mater. Sci. 233, 112659 (2024).
Ahlawat, D. et al. A family of large language models for materials research with insights into model adaptability in continued pretraining. Nat. Mach. Intell. 8, 435–448 (2026).
Miret, S. & Krishnan, N. M. A. Enabling large language models for real-world materials discovery. Nat. Mach. Intell. 7, 991–998 (2025).
Jablonka, K. M. et al. 14 examples of how LLMs can transform materials science and chemistry: a reflection on a large language model hackathon. Digit. Discov. 2, 1233–1250 (2023).
Gupta, T., Zaki, M., Krishnan, N. M. A. & Mausam MatSciBERT: a materials domain language model for text mining and information extraction. npj Comput. Mater. 8, 102 (2022).
Suvarna, M., Vaucher, A. C., Mitchell, S., Laino, T. & Pérez-Ramírez, J. Language models and protocol standardization guidelines for accelerating synthesis planning in heterogeneous catalysis. Nat. Commun. 14, 7964 (2023).
Li, J. et al. ChemVLM: exploring the power of multimodal large language models in chemistry area. Proc. AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell. 39, 415–423 (2025).
Huang, S. & Cole, J. M. BatteryDataExtractor: battery-aware text-mining software embedded with BERT models. Chem. Sci. 13, 11487–11495 (2022).
Polak, M. P. & Morgan, D. Extracting accurate materials data from research papers with conversational language models and prompt engineering. Nat. Commun. 15, 1569 (2024).
Ye, Y. et al. Construction and application of materials knowledge graph in multidisciplinary materials science via large language model. In Proc. 38th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Vol. 37, 56878–56897 (Curran Associates, 2024).
Zhao, K. et al. Artificial intelligence-driven framework for science–policy interface on global plastic life cycle environmental impacts. Nexus 3, 100116 (2026).
Kumar, A., Nazemi, F., Kodamana, H., Ramteke, M. & Bakshi, B. R. A large language model-based framework to retrieve life cycle inventory and environmental impact data from scientific literature. Environ. Sci. Technol. 59, 22533–22543 (2025).
Cheung, K., Drennan, J. & Hunter, J. Towards an ontology for data-driven discovery of new materials. In Semantic Scientific Knowledge Integration 9–14 (AAAI, 2008).
EMMO—Ontology for Materials Science https://emmc.eu/emmo/ (EMMC, 2014).
Bayerlein, B. et al. PMD Core Ontology: achieving semantic interoperability in materials science. Mater. Des. 237, 112603 (2024).
Lambrix, P. et al. The materials design ontology. Semant. Web 15, 481–515 (2024).
Rajamohan, B. P. et al. Materials Data Science Ontology(MDS-Onto): unifying domain knowledge in materials and applied data science. Sci. Data 12, 628 (2025).
Babaei Giglou, H., D’Souza, J. & Auer, S. LLMs4OL: large language models for ontology learning. In The Semantic Web—ISWC 2023 (eds Payne, T. R. et al.) 408–427 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47240-4_22 (Springer Nature, 2023).
Ghose, A., Lissandrini, M., Hansen, E. R. & Weidema, B. P. A core ontology for modeling life cycle sustainability assessment on the Semantic Web. J. Ind. Ecol. 26, 731–747 (2022).
Chen, S. et al. Life cycle assessment for all organic chemicals. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2603.15686 (2026).
Hoepfner, M. G., Jakobs, D., Santos, L. F. & Guillén-Gosálbez, G. AuLCA: augmented life cycle assessment for chemical data gaps. Green Chem. 28, 8283–8292 (2026).
Saves, P. et al. Surrogate modeling and explainable artificial intelligence for complex systems: a workflow for automated simulation exploration. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2510.16742 (2025).
Khorrami, M. S. et al. An artificial neural network for surrogate modeling of stress fields in viscoplastic polycrystalline materials. npj Comput. Mater. 9, 37 (2023).
Mannan, S. et al. UniFFBench: evaluating universal machine learning force fields against experimental measurements. Nat. Comput. Sci. 6, 894–906 https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-026-01019-4 (2026).
Song, R., Keller, A. A. & Suh, S. Rapid life-cycle impact screening using artificial neural networks. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 10777–10785 (2017).
Sun, Y., Wang, X., Ren, N., Liu, Y. & You, S. Improved machine learning models by data processing for predicting life-cycle environmental impacts of chemicals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57, 3434–3444 (2023).
Blanco, C. F., Pauliks, N., Donati, F., Engberg, N. & Weber, J. Machine learning to support prospective life cycle assessment of emerging chemical technologies. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 50, 100979 (2024).
Mann, V., Sales-Cruz, M., Gani, R. & Venkatasubramanian, V. eSFILES: intelligent process flowsheet synthesis using process knowledge, symbolic AI, and machine learning. Comput. Chem. Eng. 181, 108505 (2024).
Matthews, C., Moran, F. & Jaiswal, A. K. A review on European Union’s strategy for plastics in a circular economy and its impact on food safety. J. Clean. Prod. 283, 125263 (2021).
Parambil, V., Tripathi, U., Goyal, H. & Batra, R. Polymer property prediction using machine learning. In Materials Informatics III: Polymers, Solvents and Energetic Materials (eds Roy, K. & Banerjee, A.) 119–147 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78724-9_5 (Springer Nature, 2025).
Parambil, V., Goyal, H., Tripathi, U. & Batra, R. TransChem: a hybrid transformer and cheminformatics based framework for enhanced polymer informatics. Mater. Today Commun. 48, 113375 (2025).
Kim, C., Batra, R., Chen, L., Tran, H. & Ramprasad, R. Polymer design using genetic algorithm and machine learning. Comput. Mater. Sci. 186, 110067 (2021).
Batra, R. et al. Polymers for extreme conditions designed using syntax-directed variational autoencoders. Chem. Mater. 32, 10489–10500 (2020).
Yue, T., Tao, L., Varshney, V. & Li, Y. Benchmarking study of deep generative models for inverse polymer design. Digit. Discov. 4, 910–926 (2025).
Liu, G. & Jiang, M. Transfer learning with diffusion model for polymer property prediction. In Workshop on Machine Learning for Materials https://openreview.net/forum?id=CLdduMqmDdx (ICLR, 2023).
Kuenneth, C. et al. Polymer informatics with multi-task learning. Patterns 2, 100238 (2021).
Wang, J.-F. et al. OpenPoly: a polymer database empowering benchmarking and multi-property predictions. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 43, 1749–1760 (2025).
Gurnani, R. et al. AI-assisted discovery of high-temperature dielectrics for energy storage. Nat. Commun. 15, 6107 (2024).
Carrillo, J.-M. Y. et al. Accelerated sequence design of star block copolymers: an unbiased exploration strategy via fusion of molecular dynamics simulations and machine learning. J. Phys. Chem. B 128, 4220–4230 (2024).
Phan, B. K. et al. AI-assisted design of chemically recyclable polymers for food packaging. Polymers 18, 730 (2026).
Bejagam, K. K., Lalonde, J., Iverson, C. N., Marrone, B. L. & Pilania, G. Machine learning for melting temperature predictions and design in polyhydroxyalkanoate-based biopolymers. J. Phys. Chem. B 126, 934–945 (2022).
Atasi, C., Kern, J. & Ramprasad, R. Design of recyclable plastics with machine learning and genetic algorithm. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 64, 9249–9259 (2024).
Ali, S. S. et al. Bioplastic production in terms of life cycle assessment: a state-of-the-art review. Environ. Sci. Ecotechnol. 15, 100254 (2023).
Das, S., Liang, C. & Dunn, J. B. Life cycle assessment of polymers and their recycling. In Circular Economy of Polymers: Topics in Recycling Technologies Vol. 1391 (eds Collias, D. I. et al.) 143–170 (American Chemical Society, 2021).
Rezvani Ghomi, E. et al. The life cycle assessment for polylactic acid (PLA) to make it a low-carbon material. Polymers 13, 1854 (2021).
Datta, R., Nistane, J., Sose, A., Sahu, H. & Ramprasad, R. Machine learning for green solvents: assessment, selection and substitution. Adv. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202516851 (2025).
Zhang, D., Wang, Z., Oberschelp, C., Bradford, E. & Hellweg, S. Enhanced deep-learning model for carbon footprints of chemicals. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 12, 2700–2708 (2024).
IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Ravinder et al. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in glass science and technology: 21 challenges for the 21st century. Int. J. Appl. Glass Sci. 12, 277–292 (2021).
Finkbeiner, M., Ruhland, K., Cetiner, H., Binder, M. & Stark, B. Life cycle engineering as a tool for design for environment. In Total Life Cycle Conference and Exposition https://doi.org/10.4271/2000-01-1491 (SAE International, 2000).
Chen, Y.-F. et al. Ontology-based digital infrastructure for data-driven glass development. Adv. Eng. Mater. 27, 2401560 (2025).
Deschamps, J., Simon, B., Tagnit-Hamou, A. & Amor, B. Is open-loop recycling the lowest preference in a circular economy? Answering through LCA of glass powder in concrete. J. Clean. Prod. 185, 14–22 (2018).
Blengini, G. A., Busto, M., Fantoni, M. & Fino, D. Eco-efficient waste glass recycling: integrated waste management and green product development through LCA. Waste Manage. 32, 1000–1008 (2012).
Venugopal, V. et al. Looking through glass: knowledge discovery from materials science literature using natural language processing. Patterns 2, 7 (2021).
Yang, Y. et al. Molecular designing of potential environmentally friendly PFAS based on deep learning and generative models. Sci. Total Environ. 953, 176095 (2024).
Wang, H., Liu, W., Chen, J., Ji, S. & Bi, G. ParetoGen: generative machine learning models to push the Pareto optimal frontier of functionality–hazard trade-offs in per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances green alternative designs. Environ. Sci. Technol. 60, 7171–7182 (2026).
Lothenbach, B. et al. Cemdata18: a chemical thermodynamic database for hydrated Portland cements and alkali-activated materials. Cem. Concr. Res. 115, 472–506 (2019).
Mandal, I. et al. Evaluating large language model agents for automation of atomic force microscopy. Nat. Commun. 16, 9104 (2025).
