Our Terms & Conditions | Our Privacy Policy
(MENAFN- Asia Times)
By any measure, Asia is no longer just catching up in cybersecurity-it’s redefining what the legal future of the digital world might look like. That future, though, is anything but cohesive.
As nations in the region push ahead with ambitious digital transformations, they’re also rewriting the rules of online conduct, each in their own style, driven by distinct political pressures and national objectives.
The urgency is not abstract. In the first three months of 2025, the region accounted for nearly half of global data breaches. Not a typo-43%. And the attacks aren’t just increasing in number. They’re sharper and more systemic.
Intrusions jumped by over 100% compared to the same period last year. Across capitals from Dhaka to Seoul, lawmakers are racing to catch up-not just with criminals but with each other.
What’s emerging is not a unified playbook but a clash of legal imaginations. Some are focusing on digital sovereignty. Others on AI accountability. Few agree on definitions. Fewer still on enforcement.
However, taken together, the shifts underway across Asia offer a revealing glimpse into how different societies are navigating the risks and promises of the digital age.
Bangladesh: A democratic course correction
Bangladesh may have surprised even its critics when it tore up its controversial 2023 cyber law this May and replaced it with something far more rights-oriented. The new ordinance doesn’t just add some civil liberty language to old rules. It treats internet access as a civic entitlement-a radical departure for the region.
At the heart of the reform are three major shifts. First, it directly tackles AI-generated abuse, criminalizing the use of deepfakes and synthetic media for harassment and disinformation. It goes beyond regional peers by including politically manipulative content in its net. Second, platforms now have 72 hours to take down flagged content.
Notably, protections for journalists were written in, shielding reportage from takedown demands. Third, district-level cyber tribunals have been empowered to clear a backlog of tens of thousands of cases-an administrative nightmare that had previously gummed up the justice system.
Still, all is not settled. One provision bans online content deemed hateful to religion but offers no clear guidance on what that means in practice. Platform moderators are now caught between local enforcement and vague standards-a legal ambiguity that recalls similar tensions in Pakistan.
MENAFN29052025000159011032ID1109610939
Images are for reference only.Images and contents gathered automatic from google or 3rd party sources.All rights on the images and contents are with their legal original owners.
Aggregated From –
Comments are closed.