Original Coverage & Source Attribution: www.nature.com
Bloom, N. A. Working From Home and the Future of U.S. Economic Growth Under COVID (2020); https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jtdFIZx3hyk
Brynjolfsson, E. et al. COVID-19 and Remote Work: An Early Look at US Data. Technical Report (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2020).
Barrero, J. M., Bloom, N. & Davis, S. 60 million fewer commuting hours per day: how Americans use time saved by working from home. Working Paper (Univ. Chicago Becker Friedman Institute for Economics, 2020); https://bfi.uchicago.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/BFI_WP_2020132.pdf
Dingel, J. I. & Neiman, B. How many jobs can be done at home? J. Public Econ. 189, 104235 (2020).
Benveniste, A. These companies’ workers may never go back to the office. CNN (18 October 2020); https://cnn.it/3jIobzJ
McLean, R. These companies plan to make working from home the new normal. As in forever. CNN (25 June 2020); https://cnn.it/3ebJU27
Lund, S., Cheng, W.-L., André Dua, A. D. S., Robinson, O. & Sanghvi, S. What 800 executives envision for the postpandemic workforce. McKinsey Global Institute (23 September 2020); https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-work/what-800-executives-envision-for-the-postpandemic-workforce
Granovetter, M. The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78, 1360–1380 (1973).
Burt, R. S. Structural holes and good ideas. Am. J. Sociol. 110, 349–399 (2004).
Reagans, R. & McEvily, B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: the effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Q. 48, 240–267 (2003).
Uzzi, B. & Spiro, J. Collaboration and creativity: the small world problem. Am. J. Sociol. 111, 447–504 (2005).
Argote, L. & Ingram, P. Knowledge transfer: a basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behav. Hum. Dec. Process. 82, 150–169 (2000).
Hansen, M. T. The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Q. 44, 82–111 (1999).
Krackhardt, D. The strength of strong ties. in Networks in the Knowledge Economy (Oxford Univ. Press, 2003).
Levin, D. Z. & Cross, R. The strength of weak ties you can trust: the mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Manage. Sci. 50, 1477–1490 (2004).
McFadyen, M. A. & Cannella Jr, A. A. Social capital and knowledge creation: diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships. Acad. Manage. J. 47, 735–746 (2004).
Granovetter, M. The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited. in Social Structure and Network Analysis 105–130 (Sage, 1982).
Burt, R. S. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard Univ. Press, 2009)
Baum, J. A., McEvily, B. & Rowley, T. J. Better with age? Tie longevity and the performance implications of bridging and closure. Organ. Sci. 23, 529–546 (2012).
Kneeland, M. K. Network Churn: A Theoretical and Empirical Consideration of a Dynamic Process on Performance. PhD thesis, New York University (2019).
Kumar, P. & Zaheer, A. Ego-network stability and innovation in alliances. Acad. Manage. J. 62, 691–716 (2019).
Burt, R. S. & Merluzzi, J. Network oscillation. Acad. Manage. Discov. 2, 368–391 (2016).
Soda, G. B., Mannucci, P. V. & Burt, R. Networks, creativity, and time: staying creative through brokerage and network rejuvenation. Acad. Manage. J. (2021).
Zeng, A., Fan, Y., Di, Z., Wang, Y. & Havlin, S. Fresh teams are associated with original and multidisciplinary research. Nat. Hum. Behav. (2021).
Levin, D. Z., Walter, J. & Murnighan, J. K. Dormant ties: the value of reconnecting. Organ. Sci. 22, 923–939 (2011).
Lengel, R. H. & Daft, R. L. An Exploratory Analysis of the Relationship Between Media Richness and Managerial Information Processing. Technical Report (Texas A&M Univ. Department of Management, 1984).
Daft, R. L. & Lengel, R. H. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Manage. Sci. 32, 554–571 (1986).
Dennis, A. R., Fuller, R. M. & Valacich, J. S. Media, tasks, and communication processes: a theory of media synchronicity. MIS Q. 32, 575–600 (2008).
Morris, M., Nadler, J., Kurtzberg, T. & Thompson, L. Schmooze or lose: social friction and lubrication in e-mail negotiations. Group Dyn. Theor. Res. Pract. 6, 89–100 (2002).
Pentland, A. The new science of building great teams. Harvard Bus. Rev. 90, 60–69 (2012).
Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D. & Shockley, K. M. How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychol. Sci. Publ. Int. 16, 40–68 (2015).
Ahuja, M. K. & Carley, K. M. Network structure in virtual organizations. Organ. Sci. 10, 741–757 (1999).
Ahuja, M. K., Galletta, D. F. & Carley, K. M. Individual centrality and performance in virtual R&D groups: an empirical study. Manage. Sci. 49, 21–38 (2003).
Suh, A., Shin, K.-s, Ahuja, M. & Kim, M. S. The influence of virtuality on social networks within and across work groups: a multilevel approach. J. Manage. Inform. Syst. 28, 351–386 (2011).
DeFilippis, E., Impink, S., Singell, M., Polzer, J. T. & Sadun, R. Collaborating During Coronavirus: The Impact of COVID-19 on the Nature of Work. Working Paper 21-006 (Harvard Business School Organizational Behavior Unit, 2020).
Bernstein, E., Blunden, H., Brodsky, A., Sohn, W. & Waber, B. The implications of working without an office. Harvard Business Review (15 July 2020); https://hbr.org/2020/07/the-implications-of-working-without-an-office
Larson, J. et al. Dynamic silos: modularity in intra-organizational communication networks before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Preprint at (2021).
Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J. & Ying, Z. J. Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. Q. J. Econ. 130, 165–218 (2015).
Choudhury, P., Foroughi, C. & Larson, B. Z. Work-from-anywhere: the productivity effects of geographic flexibility. Acad. Manage. Proc. 2020, 21199 (2020).
Kleinbaum, A. M., Stuart, T. & Tushman, M. Communication (and Coordination?) in a Modern, Complex Organization (Harvard Business School, 2008).
McEvily, B., Soda, G. & Tortoriello, M. More formally: rediscovering the missing link between formal organization and informal social structure. Acad. Manage. Ann. 8, 299–345 (2014).
Everett, M. G. & Borgatti, S. P. Unpacking Burt’s constraint measure. Social Netw. 62, 50–57 (2020).
Onnela, J.-P. et al. Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 7332–7336 (2007).
ArticleÂ
CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Aral, S. & Van Alstyne, M. The diversity-bandwidth trade-off. Am. J. Sociol. 117, 90–171 (2011).
Brashears, M. E. & Quintane, E. The weakness of tie strength. Social Netw. 55, 104–115 (2018).
Burke, M. & Kraut, R. E. Growing closer on Facebook: changes in tie strength through social network site use. In Proc. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 4187–4196 (ACM, 2014); https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2556288.2557094
Herfindahl, O. C. Concentration in the Steel Industry. PhD thesis, Columbia University (1950).
Shannon, C. E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379–423 (1948).
Herbsleb, J. D. & Mockus, A. An empirical study of speed and communication in globally distributed software development. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 29, 481–494 (2003).
Ehrlich, K. & Cataldo, M. All-for-one and one-for-all? A multi-level analysis of communication patterns and individual performance in geographically distributed software development. In Proc. ACM 2012 Conf. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 945–954 (ACM, 2012); https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145345
Cataldo, M. & Herbsleb, J. D. Communication networks in geographically distributed software development. In Proc. 2008 ACM Conf. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 579–588 (ACM, 2008).
Kolko, J. Remote job postings double during coronavirus and keep rising. Indeed Hiring Lab (16 March 2021); https://www.hiringlab.org/2021/03/16/remote-job-postings-double/
Ugander, J., Karrer, B., Backstrom, L. & Kleinberg, J. Graph cluster randomization: network exposure to multiple universes. In Proc. 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 329–337 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1145/2487575.2487695
Eckles, D., Karrer, B. & Ugander, J. Design and analysis of experiments in networks: reducing bias from interference. J. Causal Inference (2016).
Bojinov, I., Simchi-Levi, D. & Zhao, J. Design and analysis of switchback experiments. Preprint at SSRN (2020).
Lechner, C., Frankenberger, K. & Floyd, S. W. Task contingencies in the curvilinear relationships between intergroup networks and initiative performance. Acad. Manage. J. 53, 865–889 (2010).
Chung, Y. & Jackson, S. E. The internal and external networks of knowledge-intensive teams: the role of task routineness. J. Manage. 39, 442–468 (2013).
Dennis, A. R., Wixom, B. H. & Vandenberg, R. J. Understanding fit and appropriation effects in group support systems via meta-analysis. MIS Q. 25, 167–193 (2001).
Fuller, R. M. & Dennis, A. R. Does fit matter? The impact of task-technology fit and appropriation on team performance in repeated tasks. Inform. Syst. Res. 20, 2–17 (2009).
Athey, S., Mobius, M. M. & Pál, J. The impact of aggregators on Internet news consumption. Preprint at SSRN (2017).
Swisher, K. Physically together: here’s the internal Yahoo no-work-from-home memo for remote workers and maybe more. All Things (22 February 2013).
Simons, J. IBM, a pioneer of remote work, calls workers back to the office. Wall Street Journal (18 May 2017).
Barrero, J. M., Bloom, N. & Davis, S. J. Why working from home will stick. Working Paper (Univ. Chicago, Becker Friedman Institute for Economics, 2020).
Bloom, N., Davis, S. J. & Zhestkova, Y. COVID-19 shifted patent applications toward technologies that support working from home. Working Paper (Univ. Chicago, Becker Friedman Institute for Economics, 2020).
Athey, S. & Imbens, G. W. Identification and inference in nonlinear difference-in-differences models. Econometrica 74, 431–497 (2006).
Iacus, S. M., King, G. & Porro, G. Causal inference without balance checking: coarsened exact matching. Polit. Anal. 20, 1–24 (2012).
Muscillo, A. A note on (matricial and fast) ways to compute Burt’s structural holes. Preprint at (2021).
